A month has passed since I have began working at the Western Fertility Institute. Whilst the access in the fieldwork was slow, the life within the clinic was frantic and constantly evolving, like it happens here everyday. The people that cross the fertility clinic are different types, everyone with their own journey and story. There is the fertility staff composed by nurses, doctors, anesthesiologist and coordinators. The are patients in the clinic for various reasons: some to receive fertility treatments, whilst others offered their reproductive capabilities to intended parents.
In this climax, the research project has been progressively revised, resized and adapted to the context in which I interact with daily. I have built a series of questionnaires designed to have an overview of people I’m interacting with: intended parents(s), egg donor and surrogates at their first experience and repeat egg donors and surrogates. The questionnaires are simply tools to understand the background of these people.
As an anthropologist, I won’t just be using the questionnaires: indeed, I am conducting research with the ethnographic method. Doing “an ethnography” means several things. It means interviewing people, understanding their point of view, their thoughts and their reality. It also means using the so called “participant observation”. I have many occasions to observe the dynamics while I am at WFI. Since I am conducting a research within a fertility clinic, I will also interview the staff of Western Fertility Institute, because as presented in literature, the fertility staff plays an important role during the fertility treatment, not only for medical reasons. I will use the theoretical concept of hybrid technologies proposed by Laura Mamo (2007) to read the experiences of all the people who cross pathways within the fertility institute and undergo treatments.
Mamo L., 2007, Queering Reproduction. Achieving Pregnancy in the Age of Technosciences, Duke University Press.